Lake Earl Grange A Community Action Grange (Rev 2) BASE

Lake Earl Grange E-News Page 2A
Home
LEG News
LEG Actvities
LEG Youth
LEG About Us
LEG Contacts
LEG Archives
CA Grange
USA Grange
LEG Links

D1008.jpg

SPPORT OUR TROOPS
ribbon_small2.gif
(click on ribbion)

dividerA.gif

646pxwoodyguthriesmll.jpg

THIS LAND IS YOUR LAND 
This land is your land, this land is my land
From California, to the New York Island
From the redwood forest, to the gulf stream waters
This land was made for you and me
words and music by Woody Guthrie

 

Our State “brown shirted Civil Servants (AKA “enviro interpreters’) are calling to US again, along with their “stake holder groups” to “cross the Tees – dot the Iiis - & fill in their blanks”; so as to get the ok on their General Plan” and our "green sticker tax monies” to manage US off our “Public Lands” and rewrite the words to Woody’s song to read – “This Land Is Gov Land…” and they are telling US the Gov'll interpret its use i.e. General Plan..

 

Public recreation on public lands - what a novel idea – but these are dirty words to the Gov! … Unless we re-interpret them for CA State Parks at these public workshops:

 

Roadless040406-1.jpeg

"Please Join US" & Write Off CA State Parks

And The Next 

Lock Up – Lock Out – Lock Down

With Their Own Comment Sheets

 

TO PICK 'EM UP - CLICK HERE

 

REMEMBER - Deadline Extended

Now They Must Be In By 04 November 07

Send To: Ms. Petra Unger

EDAW, Inc.

2022 "J" Street

sacramento, CA 9581

OR E-mail It To Her @:
petra.unger@edaw.com

 

.

 

(For More Info - click here)

As I said last time; “… let's go... telling 'em we want a true "Public Park"; You remember those, don't you? A place were families could rest, walk, walk dogs, ride horses, bike and motor to secluded redoubts to fish, picnic and enjoy extended camping. After all is said and done - it is our public land and we are the public! Let's ask them how much of our "public 25,000 acres" the public will get to use and how much of our public park we will we be locked out of? “

The fundamental logic underling the development of the “General Plan Amendment” (GPA) propaganda rap is that after all is said and done – it can never be greater or encompass more than the General Plan. Terms like “general plan”, “stake holder groups’ and interrupter” are exclusionary and are designed to preclude any meaningful accomplishment through the “development of alternatives’, “future management actions”, “public outreach”, “community & agency input”, “development of the GPA” and any other meaningful input. They, their stakeholder groups and other special interest “friends” feel they have as so framed this discussion

 

NO, NO, NO - only if we fall to show, disengage and walk away from this. IF on the other hand, however, we show up in large and impressive numbers and reinstate the original meaning of “civil servants”, stress “diverse-ability” is humane inclusive, that WE ARE the stakeholders in this community and that “PUBLIC land” is just that – PUBLIC! And keep ramming this home with a strong “poking verbal finger” we can reframe and redefine this debate. WE CAN take back our county.

 

Keep The Public In Public Lands

&

The Public lands In Public Hands!

dividerA.gif

   Related Documentation To Off Highway Vehicle (OHV) Usage  
               In                 
Del Norte County   
 
Extensive National Parks Related Documentation
 
Extensive CA State Parks Related Documentation
 
Extensive Mill Creek Related Documentation
 
 
TDSP Gen Public Protest Letter (020806)
 
TDSP Iterim Plan
 
Letter From DN BofS To State Parks (020106)
 
Letter From LEG To CA Resources Agency (083105)
 
LEG Letter To CA State ParksThis Is To Address The Following: ( 020806A&B)
 
E-Mail Support For Multi Use TDSP
 
CA DEPT OF PARKS & REC ORDER NO. 1-635-88 (020406)
 
DN BofS Letter To Ruth Coleman State Parks HQ In Support Of Multi Use
 
Agenda CA State Parks Meeting @ Grange (012606)
 
 
Tolowa Dunes Related OHV Documentation

smileytype.gif
alt

dividerA.gif

Can Be Enlarged
Image1MillCrkMap.gif
(to enlarge click on above map)

One Fine Gift

Today, less than 10 percent

of the Mill Creek property is old

growth; most of the remaining forest was

logged within the last 50 years. When voters passed the California Clean Water,

Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection

Act of 2002, did they realize that some of the money

would be used to help stabilize, repair, and convert old

logging roads for use as recreational trails or to restore fish

passageways and enhance fish habitat?

With over 2- billion dollars to distribute, the value

of the Mill Creek watershed made it a project recipient.

During the extensive logging of the Mill Creek property

over the past 50 years, a vast network of roads were

constructed to remove the timber and transfer it to the

mill for processing. There are more than 255 miles of

roads on 25,000 acres.

http://www.nps.gov/redw/parknews/upload/VG03_featurestories.pdf

Already Written Mill Creek General Plan

Hikingcolor.jpg

And From The LOR:

We hear there is another CA State Parks meeting planed for 21 June 07 on the Already Written Mill Creek General Plan (AWMCGP). Dejah vue!

This time it's Supervisor Bruce Lynn, blathering on how he's; "hoping this will be a cooperative process.... We definitely want to find out what the different interests are and include them".  

Well at least he hasn't started by limiting "parks" opening remarks to our local "stake holders". Nope, residents will be invited to attend a series of meetings and give input.

However, one might ask - for what purpose? Our LOR reports; "State Parks will determine how much land use, circulation and facilities, natural and cultural resources, and education might affect the already written Mill Creek General Plan." LOR goes on to ask us to "Help Create the Plan", to be fare the article later says to amend. What nonsense is this? According to our LOR "The General Plan Amendment will include all environmental regulations that apply." Mmmm, doesn't sound like a hell of a lot of room for public use. Oh but the public "will be at the table" so to speak. BUT WILL IT MEAN ANYTING? The die seems cast.

Wonder if they'll have us write our comments on taped up "wall paper" like the last time we visited? Mmmm, do you think "parks" will listen and include our interests or just listen? Will they seriously amend / adjust / change \ recon fig their already made plan for us "unwashed masses"? Judging by the most recent as well as most distant past - naaaah!

So, let's go anyways to make 'em squirm and kick 'em in their - - - mmmm, their little "gray cells", very, very little "gray cells" telling 'em we want a true "Public Park"; You remember those, don't you? A place were families could rest, walk, walk dogs, ride horses, bike and motor to secluded redoubts to picnic and camp. After all is said and done - it is our public land and we are the public! Let's ask them how much of our "public 25,000 acres" the public will get to use and how much of our public park we will we be locked out of? 

Neighbors let's not pass this one up, you can be sure "the friends of" the county won't. There are one heck of a lot of questions for and comments on the "already written Mill Creek General Plan" I believe we all have.

Should You Want To Go & Plan For The Plan 

(click here to see Community Calendar for time & place)

alt

direction.jpg

 

Staff Recommendation June 29, 2006 MILL CREEK IMPLEMENTATION PHASE I

Redwood Coast State Park Superintendent Bruce Lynn has announced that EDAW, Inc. is the consultant selected to prepare a General Plan Amendment for the Del Norte Coast Redwoods State Park and Mill Creek addition. Once adopted, the General Plan Amendment will become a component of the existing Redwood National and State Parks General Management Plan/General Plan..

 

Plan to be developed for

Mill Creek

Published: May 11, 2007

By Cornelia de Bruin

Triplicate staff writer

California State Parks is beginning to develop a general plan for the greater Mill Creek watershed addition.

LOR@:

http://www.triplicate.com/news/story.cfm?story_no=4119

dividerA.gif

2006 NPS Management Policies

More than 45,000 commenters responded to the proposed draft Management Policies during the 127-day review period that ended February 25, 2006. Those comments were read, processed, summarized and organized by National Park Service staff in the Office of Policy and the Environmental Quality Division. The results were then considered by a National Park Service review team* that met in Denver the week of April 10, 2006. Based on the comments received, the review team prepared extensive edits to the draft. The revised text was subsequently evaluated by a number of park managers and subject matter experts who suggested further refinements. The National Leadership Council suggested additional improvements.

 

A special committee representing the National Park System Advisory Board met with Deputy Director Steve Martin and key NPS staff May 23 and May 24, 2006, to discuss the revised draft. The committee then reported back to the full Board, which discussed and endorsed the committee's recommendations at its June 9, 2006, meeting. The Board's recommendations were then considered by the Director and other NPS senior managers and incorporated as appropriate.

An internal Servicewide review was completed July 10, 2006. At the close of the comment period a review committee met to consider the comments and make any further edits to improve the draft. A final revised draft was then reviewed by the National Leadership Council before being presented for the Director's consideration and approval. Director Mainella approved the final document August 31, 2006.

For More Info On This Doc & Links To Other Related Resource Material - Click Here.

NPS

dividerA.gif

dividerA.gif

Policy Options for a Changing Rural America

No longer tied closely to farm policies, rural economies in the 21st century will be shaped demographic change, industrial restructuring, and national economic trends.

Leslie A. Whitener and Tim Parker

LEGBarnPicCoped.jpg

In 1950, 4 out of every 10 rural people lived on a farm, and almost a third of the Nation’s rural workforce was engaged directly in production agriculture. Because agriculture dominated the social and economic well-being of most of the rural population, public policy related to agriculture was a dominant force shaping rural life both on the farm and in rural
communities. But today, rural America is vastly different from the 1950’s, and current commodity-based farm policies do not fully address the complexities of rural economies and populations. Farms are larger and more efficient, farm households depend more on off-farm income, and rural communities look for nonfarm sources of economic growth. Today, less than 10 percent of rural people live on a farm, and only 14 percent of the rural workforce is employed in farming.

In addition, some rural communities have changed dramatically since 1990 due to increased population from urban areas, shifts in age and ethnic composition, and economic and industrial restructuring. Population changes are creating new needs as new migrants from urban areas and abroad revitalize some nonmetropolitan (nonmetro) or rural areas, while long-term population and employment losses have the opposite effect on other rural communities. Increasing competition from abroad and sectoral shifts in employment present new challenges and opportunities in the worldwide economy and raise the question—how can rural communities successfully build on their economic base and other assets to retain and attract population and employment? And, when, where, and under what circumstances will rural development strategies be most successful? The diversity within rural America dictates that strategies tailored to particular types of rural economies may be more effective than a broader “one size fits all” rural policy. Demographic change, the health of the Nation’s economy, and industrial restructuring will be major factors affecting rural policy in the 21st century.

(for the rest of this article click - here)

For More Info
417px-Dairy_farm.jpeg
(click on above pic)

dividerA.gif

Congress Reviews
The "Farm Security & Rural Investment Act"
 
Agricultural policy affects not only the economic well-being of farm households, but also our food supply, the environment, and the future of rural communities. The current farm law (the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002) remains in force only through 2007. A proposal for a new farm bill was released by the Bush administration at the end of January, and other proposals have been made by various stakeholder groups. The agriculture committees in Congress have begun to debate these ideas and develop their own proposals. In the upcoming months, they will be crafting legislation that will eventually become the next farm law.
And Now For The Rest Of The Story!

dividerA.gif

Read All About It:

Storm over North Coast Rights

(We all knew this would cause some folks a lot of heartburn.  Ed and a number of folks in the Orick area deserve a lot of credit for continuing to battle for fishing and other access rights to RNP.   I remember the large event that Ed helped put together in 2001 to highlight the plight of the surf fishermen and other access interests  Good job ED!

News Release from 2001 Orick Event

http://www.atvsource.com/articles/press_releases/2001/062601_freedom_rally_and_protest.htm

--- Don Amador / BRC)

kingsalmontn.gif

 

A new federal law lets some surf fishermen drive onto the beaches at Redwood National Park, where many have long resented policies that restricted access.

By Julie Cart
Times Staff Writer

(for the rest of the story click here)

dividerA.gif

Enter content here

Enter content here

Enter content here

dividerA.gif

To Check Local Gas Prices
EIApump.gif
(click pic & use zip)

Contact LEG
contact_sign02.gif
(click pic)

LEG E- News Front Page
news_sign.gif
(click pic)

Just click desired page below to go there:

 

direction.jpg

dividerA.gif